<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winamp - free music/video software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2006/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2006/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html</link>
	<description>The personal blog of the Cottrill family, Canadians living in Mexico.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Devonshire</title>
		<link>http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2006/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1473</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Devonshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2005/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1473</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info!  I will probably play with it and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info!  I will probably play with it and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2006/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1472</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2005/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1472</guid>
		<description>There's obviously on ongoing debate about which one is better, and I really haven't compared the programs in any detail.  From what I can tell, Winamp takes less memory; it's quicker and less invasive overall.  No doubt it can do some things Media Player can't, and vice versa.

I find there are a lot of neat "plugins" that add great features to Winamp.  The skins work better on my screen than the clunky Media Player skins.  But there are things I still use MP for too.

I guess one media player is never enough...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s obviously on ongoing debate about which one is better, and I really haven&#8217;t compared the programs in any detail.  From what I can tell, Winamp takes less memory; it&#8217;s quicker and less invasive overall.  No doubt it can do some things Media Player can&#8217;t, and vice versa.</p>
<p>I find there are a lot of neat &#8220;plugins&#8221; that add great features to Winamp.  The skins work better on my screen than the clunky Media Player skins.  But there are things I still use MP for too.</p>
<p>I guess one media player is never enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Devonshire</title>
		<link>http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2006/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Devonshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2005/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>Curious, does it do anything  that Windows Media Player 11 doesn't do?  Why this and not the ever present WMP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious, does it do anything  that Windows Media Player 11 doesn&#8217;t do?  Why this and not the ever present WMP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teodoro Rosario</title>
		<link>http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2006/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>Teodoro Rosario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cottrillcompass.com/blog/2005/winamp-free-musicvideo-software.html#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>nesesito ests programa porque es bueno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nesesito ests programa porque es bueno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
