The Passion AFTER
It’s impossible to be objective about The Passion because almost everybody already has an opinion about Jesus, and the story of His life. Everyone will see the movie through their own lenses, so watch for that when you read and hear what reviewers say, and what your friends and neighbours say. You’ll hear Christians talking about how it was the “story of their faith”, and that it was “moving.” You’ll hear rabbis calling it a “lie.” Some will complain about the violence, others that it wasn’t historical. But of course, movies are art, and everyone’s opinion on art is different, as you may have noticed the last time someone recommended a movie to you and when you watched it you wondered why.
That being said, in an effort to be as objective as possible, here are some thoughts. First, the pros:
* Attention to detail
* Good acting (most of the time)
* An attempt to use the information we have in all four Gospels (thank you!)
* A little humour (yes, really)
* Artistic interpretation
And now a few not-so-good or at least neutral things. First, this movie is not 100% accurate in every detail. For example, as Judas is coming three of the disciples are standing watching Jesus. In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus is in the midst of waking them up as Judas comes (Matt 26:44-47). Jesus and Pilate speak together in Latin (I believe Latin was used mostly for official purposes; Pilate would normally speak Greek). The woman with Mary is Mary Magdalene, and the movie portrays her as the woman caught in adultery (John 8), but the Bible doesn’t make the connection, but says that Jesus cast 7 demons out of her (Mark 16:9). There are other things I noticed as well.
The movie adds a lot and changes a bit, which is not necessarily bad all the time. After all, every time you put a book on film you have to add something, and interpret. You’ll hear a lot of dialogue that you’ll never read in your Bible. Some of these things worked well, but many could have been avioded.
Let me say again, this is a very violent, gory movie. And lest you wonder how many movies I’ve seen, note that well known film critic Roger Ebert said that this was the most violent film he had ever seen (see his review here). Unless you have a very different philosophy than me, you’ll keep your kids away from this movie for sure. (Note: It’s actually a little funny how much complaint there has been in the news about the violence of this film, considering how highly movies like Gladiator or Braveheart seem to be valued. Perhaps the reason is that it is considered a “religious” film and therefore thought to be a “family” affair)
Viewers may also want to be warned about the prominence of the demonic in The Passion. Oh yes, the demons are obviously the bad guys, I’m not suggesting the movie is demonic. But Satan and his demons are portrayed prominently throughout the movie, and some viewers may find it shocking.
Interestingly, it could be argued that Mary is the main character of The Passion. At least, Jesus and Mary are the main characters. You may find yourself connecting more with her character than his. Another thing to note (as Ebert did in his review) is that the script is very much inspired by the Stations of the Cross, used by Roman Catholics as a tool to meditate on the sufferings of Christ. (Gibson himself belongs to a conservative Catholic sect, and has announced publicly that he believes there is no salvation outside the Roman Catholic Church.)
As far as movie making quality goes, the movie is well done. I wouldn’t at this point rate it as one of the all time greats.
Is it an evangelistic tool, or a Sunday School lesson? Well, one thing I noticed is that a viewer would often be lost if she or he didn’t have a fairly good knowledge of the Bible. There is very little context, very little explanation. Unlike the Jesus film (1979) for example, you hear very little of Jesus’ teaching about who He was and why He came. You really won’t hear the Gospel or really get to know Jesus in this film unless you already know quite a bit. Don’t expect people who go to the movie to come out with a sudden understanding of Christ. Because of this and some of the controversial aspects such as the violence, I would not call it an evangelistic tool or Sunday School lesson.
However, much of the “evangelistic thrust” has had a different focus. The idea is this: people will see the movie, and they’ll have questions. Are you ready to answer? That kind of approach I’m in support of. God can use anything that helps us to think about the big questions of life, and this movie does that. We should be ready to point people in the right direction, at a time when discussions about Jesus are at the highest they may be for years to come. (for more on the promotion of the movie by evangelicals and others, see my previous blog entry)
Yes, Jesus was a real man. He changed the course of history. Why? Well, He claimed to be God in the flesh. He claimed to be the Way, the Truth and the Life. He suffered and died willingly, and then came back to life. He was seen alive by hundreds, and today is followed by millions. Take the time to find out why!
See our quick explanation of the life of Jesus here. For other tools related to The Passion, see my previous blog entry on the topic.
Mom C.
5 March 2004 @ 8:09 pm
Thanks for writing this, Jim. I was interested to hear your comments on this film, especially since you’ve actually seen it.
Pastor in Turtleford
6 March 2004 @ 4:13 pm
Well, done! Some excellent point and good background material.
Stephanie Nesdoly
12 March 2004 @ 1:28 pm
Very well written Jim. I agree. Especially about the whole idea of the movie as an evangelistic tool. I’ve discussed this with other friends who have also seen the movie, and I always come back to the fact that it is a movie. I don’t know that Gibson’s motive was evangelism. But, like you said, it will cause people to ask questions, and we can be prepared to answer them, which is how I believe God will use the movie to reach people.